Yes, the yahoo one is mine, although I don't really use that email address anymore. But, it is my OG email address. I remember some guy name John that started it, originally for the H-Prod...
Type: Posts; User: Bill Miller
Yes, the yahoo one is mine, although I don't really use that email address anymore. But, it is my OG email address. I remember some guy name John that started it, originally for the H-Prod...
It's a good thing you are doing Greg. When did you take it over from Bill?
What's the link to the Prod site? Did you take it over from John, and keep all the registered users? Have you talked...
Must have stumbled into the Wayback machine.
In fairness Chris, I wouldn't throw it all on the ITAC. If the higher-ups didn't want something to happen, it didn't matter how much objective information and unified support the ITAC put behind...
It may or may not be a cause, but if it is, I could think that losing track time may be a consideration. I just looked at the lap times at Summit Point for GT1 and ITR. The GT1 record is just under...
Got it, thanks! What's new guys?
None of the numbers I have are good anymore. If anybody can pass this on to Doug, or PM me his # or email, I would greatly appreciate it.
No more calls please, we have a winner.
BINGO!
Well stated Raymond.
That's some really entertaining reading right there.
Thanks for the update Josh. Would something like the VW New Beetle in ITC and the Mk IV Golf in ITB but an example of what I bolded?
The G3 is processed @ 25%, the G2 is processed @ 30%, and the G1 is processed at 39%.
Chris,
I agree with you that if the G2 is processed @ 30%, it's at least 50# heavy. If they processed the...
True dat! ;)
jhooten joke here =======
hoppe here ===========
WOOSH!
Charlie,
Can you give some examples of what you mean by 'not serving ITB well'? Also, what do you consider 'good results'?
From what I've seen, most think ITB is pretty well balanced, but...
That's some pretty funny stuff right there Jake. I didn't realize a car that was 25 years old (like the AW11 MR2 w/ the 4A-GE engine) was considered 'new' technology. What other 'new' technology...
Congrats and best of luck to you Josh! I really commend your courage and dedication in accepting this in light of recent developments.:smilie_pokal::023:
As has been stated, Roz has been doing this for years. The other guy I would get pics from was Ken Brown. The general take on these guys is that they're scum and use seedy business practices. ...
Thanks Andy. Bob's comment leaves out a few important details (like the +/- 100# is close enough). Gotta applaud Jeff for not pulling any punches w/ his post on the SCCA board.
Bob's post seems to be saying that ALL the cars in IT were considered during the initial application of the process, and ones that weren't adjusted didn't need to be. That's SIGNIFICANTLY...
Figures it's a VW. :D
So, any sign of the rumored comments from the CRB/BoD that were going to be posted on the SCCA forums?
That's been my gripe all along Andy, there's NEVER a 'why'. How can they continue to spout the but can't follow that up w/ what that specification is based on. They know they pull this crap out of...
Josh, My memory on all the details is a bit fuzzy. I believe that you are correct. They were going to move some of the SSB cars into T3, and the rest of them, along w/ the SSC cars were going to...
Actually Josh, it was shot down by the mfg's. They threatened to pull support for racers running their cars if the SCCA turned SSB and SSC into T4 and T5. There was a letter circulating that was...